Free Government
Democracy In Your Hands.

sign up | log in
  • Home
  • Legislation
  • Polls
  • Forums
  • Groups
  • People

FreeGovernment.org is in active development. We consider your feedback critical to our success, so please share your suggestions through this form.

All bills Bill forum
FG BILL #7

S.223 Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act

Do you support this bill?
Your vote is set to adviser
Show related poll
Discussion topics

No topics for this bill.

Summary

To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and reports in electronic form.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act'.

comments

SEC. 2. SENATE CANDIDATES REQUIRED TO FILE ELECTION REPORTS IN ELECTRONIC FORM.

(a) In General- Section 304(a)(11)(D) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 434(a)(11)(D)) is amended to read as follows:

`(D) As used in this paragraph, the terms `designation', `statement', or `report' mean a designation, statement or report, respectively, which--

`(i) is required by this Act to be filed with the Commission, or

`(ii) is required under section 302(g) to be filed with the Secretary of the Senate and forwarded by the Secretary to the Commission.'.

(b) Conforming Amendments-

(1) Section 302(g)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(2)) is amended by inserting `or 1 working day in the case of a designation, statement, or report filed electronically' after `2 working days'.

(2) Section 304(a)(11)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 434(a)(11)(B)) is amended by inserting `or filed with the Secretary of the Senate under section 302(g)(1) and forwarded to the Commission' after `Act'.

(c) Effective Date- The amendments made by this section shall apply to any designation, statement, or report required to be filed after the date of enactment of this Act.

comments
See Entire Bill

Updates

New Users

geoffdaily
Person
stephanbronconni...
Person
Other
gwillen
Person
djdesjardins
Person
Republican Party
powellc
Person
Other
ME
jfinkels
Person

Support FreeGovernment.org

Recent Posts

brokenladder posted on Electoral Reform Party
Here's an idea i have for a "unity" type of party. A "metaparty" essentially. Our goal is to serve as an alternative to the plurality-based two party system, enabling the current alternative parties, as well as new ones, to function as "sub-parties". Our...
nosetu commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Freedom is only an illusion. Unless we get involved in the "core" of our government, our government will only superficially give us the freedoms it feels it needs to keep us docile. Even if the government needed to stage numerous parties in debates to feed our thirst they would still...
bdanaher17 commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Why not! Freedom is Popular.

Recent Polls

"Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?"
5 votes
100.0% Yes 0.0% No
"Should Scientology be disbanded?"
13 votes
38.5% Yes 61.5% No
"Churches should be free to decide, without government interference, which couples they will or will not marry."
16 votes
87.5% Yes 12.5% No
© 2009 FreeGovernment.org
About Us | Contact Us | Blog
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Source Code
Give us feedback!