Free Government
Democracy In Your Hands.

sign up | log in
  • Home
  • Legislation
  • Polls
  • Forums
  • Groups
  • People

FreeGovernment.org is in active development. We consider your feedback critical to our success, so please share your suggestions through this form.

All polls Poll forum Show related bill
Do you support FG Bill #3?
Your vote is set to adviser
Poll Statistics
Today All Users Verified Voters
Yes 89.3% n/a
No 10.7% n/a
All 28 0
Topics Being Discussed

No topics for this poll.

Description & Updates
H.R.6052 Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act of 2008
Statistics in Real-Time
Timeline of Poll Results
Poll Comments
lacerace87, Idaho Aug 30, 2008 07:03pm

Jaymefosa…wait untill one is destroyed from a natural cause. such as a tornado, hurricane, earthquake, flooding. that would be the best way to go about it i think. you don’t have to pay really much to destroy our old system in that town.

knome, Rockport, MA Jul 11, 2008 09:53am

Hmm.. I honestly think that the more serious problem in urban design is not living space but services. Water, gas, electricity, sewage.

Everything else comes from those elements, in terms of capacity. So those systems would all have to be modular as well, which is a very interesting problem :)

aguay, Portland, ME Jul 09, 2008 03:54pm

It would be modular, something conceptually similar to the blocky futurism of Moshe Safdie but more practical, with the means to construct additional modules an integral part of the org. of the city.

jaymefosa, Waltham, MA Jul 09, 2008 01:23am

Hi Andrew. If you were going to design a city so that it could simultaneously support a growing population and a future maximum population, how would you go about it?

aguay, Portland, ME Jul 08, 2008 01:40am

I think it would be more cost-effective to initiate ground-up construction of efficient, accessible cities rather than endlessly modify existing infrastructure.

Displaying all 5 entries

Updates

New Users

geoffdaily
Person
stephanbronconni...
Person
Other
gwillen
Person
djdesjardins
Person
Republican Party
powellc
Person
Other
ME
jfinkels
Person

Support FreeGovernment.org

Recent Posts

brokenladder posted on Electoral Reform Party
Here's an idea i have for a "unity" type of party. A "metaparty" essentially. Our goal is to serve as an alternative to the plurality-based two party system, enabling the current alternative parties, as well as new ones, to function as "sub-parties". Our...
nosetu commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Freedom is only an illusion. Unless we get involved in the "core" of our government, our government will only superficially give us the freedoms it feels it needs to keep us docile. Even if the government needed to stage numerous parties in debates to feed our thirst they would still...
bdanaher17 commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Why not! Freedom is Popular.

Recent Polls

"Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?"
5 votes
100.0% Yes 0.0% No
"Should Scientology be disbanded?"
13 votes
38.5% Yes 61.5% No
"Churches should be free to decide, without government interference, which couples they will or will not marry."
16 votes
87.5% Yes 12.5% No
© 2009 FreeGovernment.org
About Us | Contact Us | Blog
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Source Code
Give us feedback!