Jaymefosa…wait untill one is destroyed from a natural cause. such as a tornado, hurricane, earthquake, flooding. that would be the best way to go about it i think. you don’t have to pay really much to destroy our old system in that town.
Hmm.. I honestly think that the more serious problem in urban design is not living space but services. Water, gas, electricity, sewage.
Everything else comes from those elements, in terms of capacity. So those systems would all have to be modular as well, which is a very interesting problem :)
It would be modular, something conceptually similar to the blocky futurism of Moshe Safdie but more practical, with the means to construct additional modules an integral part of the org. of the city.
Hi Andrew. If you were going to design a city so that it could simultaneously support a growing population and a future maximum population, how would you go about it?
I think it would be more cost-effective to initiate ground-up construction of efficient, accessible cities rather than endlessly modify existing infrastructure.