Free Government
Democracy In Your Hands.

sign up | log in
  • Home
  • Legislation
  • Polls
  • Forums
  • Groups
  • People

FreeGovernment.org is in active development. We consider your feedback critical to our success, so please share your suggestions through this form.

All topics

Comments

Author Post
bob921
East Lansing, MI
#1 Aug 04, 2008 01:43pm

This is complicated for me. I think that it would be useful do this, but how would people organize outside of politics? If I want to contribute resources to a factory, for example, would I have to give to the individual person who owns it? Could multiple people own it, so that more people could have a say in how it is run? I suppose this is the issue – how to have multiple people control a resource and invest in it.

So I don’t know yet.

johnbenclark
Novato, CA
#2 Aug 05, 2008 04:41pm

@bob921: I don’t think this is suggesting abolition of corporations, but simply removing many of the rights they have gained over time due to interpretations by the Supreme Court ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood_debate ).

christopherritter
Dayton, OH
#3 Aug 05, 2008 05:09pm

Corporations are not Individuals. They’re huge, conglomerations of Individuals who frequently control vast amounts of wealth and influence—though, admittedly, I tried to start my own Corporation and received neither vast amounts of wealth nor influence, so apparently you do have to work at it. Still doesn’t make them Individuals.

bob921
East Lansing, MI
#4 Aug 06, 2008 11:40am

@johnbenclark: ah ha. Having read the debate, I am against corporate personhood.

symetrist
#5 Aug 27, 2008 05:04pm

if it can’t A) serve in the military, B) serve in a jury, C) be arrested for criminal acts and it isn’t physically or mentally disabled then it should not be a person…legally

brandonburt
#6 Aug 30, 2008 02:41am

If I form a legal corporation and thus control an entity with the legal status of an individual, then suddenly my will counts as that of two individuals. It’s undemocratic.

Displaying all 6 entries
Reply

Updates

New Users

gwillen
Person
djdesjardins
Person
Republican Party
powellc
Person
Other
ME
jfinkels
Person
zstarmac
Person
Democratic Party
Eugene, OR
bdanaher17
Person
Libertarian Party
Blue Springs, MO

Support FreeGovernment.org

Recent Posts

brokenladder posted on Electoral Reform Party
Here's an idea i have for a "unity" type of party. A "metaparty" essentially. Our goal is to serve as an alternative to the plurality-based two party system, enabling the current alternative parties, as well as new ones, to function as "sub-parties". Our...
nosetu commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Freedom is only an illusion. Unless we get involved in the "core" of our government, our government will only superficially give us the freedoms it feels it needs to keep us docile. Even if the government needed to stage numerous parties in debates to feed our thirst they would still...
bdanaher17 commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Why not! Freedom is Popular.

Recent Polls

"Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?"
4 votes
100.0% Yes 0.0% No
"Should Scientology be disbanded?"
12 votes
41.7% Yes 58.3% No
"Churches should be free to decide, without government interference, which couples they will or will not marry."
15 votes
93.3% Yes 6.7% No
© 2008 FreeGovernment.org
About Us | Contact Us | Blog
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Source Code
Give us feedback!